Native leaders
set stage for disaster
ALISON BLACKDUCK
The Toronto Star
Tuesday, February 6, 2001
I left last week's Assembly of First Nations National Fisheries Strategy
Conference in Halifax in the same mood I left Esgenoopetitj (Burnt
Church) last September - tired, frustrated and discouraged.
It's not that I don't care about aboriginal and treaty rights.
My frustration stems from watching the AFN try to micromanage a complex
and volatile situation whose magnitude is beyond its current capabilities.
The micromanagement began again last Monday when the AFN communications
staff barred all members of the media from most of the conference.
At first, we were told we could hang around the conference centre
hallways and talk to delegates while they moved between workshop sessions,
but we weren't allowed to attend any plenary sessions or keynote speeches.
After much intense lobbying by a few journalists, that restriction
was lifted the next day, but the damage had already been done - the
AFN's message to the media was that we would hear only what the AFN
wanted us to hear.
This message reminded me of the time I spent volunteering in Esgenoopetitj.
During the month of September, most, if not all, of the information
released to the media from Esgenoopetitj was handled by the AFN.
The general picture that emerged was that it was working in a full
and equal partnership with the people of Esgenoopetitj, including
the chief and council. However, as time has passed, this seems to
be less and less true.
Rather than assisting the people of Esgenoopetitj, I saw the AFN take
over, imposing its agenda without fully consulting the parties on
whose behalf it was supposed to be working.
The failed mediation effort headed by former Ontario premier Bob Rae
is a good case in point.
According to notes from an AFN legal/strategy session undertaken in
mid- September, 2000, an acceptable protocol should have been in place
to ensure that both sides had adequate resources and time to prepare
for mediation.
Based on what I saw at Esgenoopetitj community headquarters, the AFN
pressed for mediation to begin without properly educating the people
and leadership of Esgenoopetitj about the process and without providing
adequate technical support.
During the time I was there, the technical support work - answering
telephones, faxing documents, collating documents and arranging community
meetings - wasn't done by AFN staff, but by a handful of volunteers
who had travelled from far and wide to assist in any way they could.
Many times, we told the AFN that we were desperate for trained support
staff, but nothing was done - and any criticism of how the AFN was
managing the day- to-day activities was either rebuffed as trivial
or ignored altogether. As a result, none of the volunteers was certain
how to proceed and the attendant anxiety took its toll. Work standards
varied widely.
Unfortunately, rather than establishing a lasting structure that could
serve the people of Esgenoopetitj once we left, we were forced to
make it up as we went along.
The result has been disastrous.
For example, thousands of dollars donated to Esgenoopetitj from across
Canada to assist with legal and equipment costs seems to have gone
missing for reasons I don't understand. One week, I'm told that so-and-so
was managing the books; the next week, the blame is shifted once again.
It's impossible to get any clear answers because I don't know who
speaks for Esgenoopetitj any more.
One faction backed by the AFN claims it speaks for the silent majority
of Esgenoopetitj, and claims the chief and some councillors are out
of touch, while the chief says his leadership is being undermined
by the AFN-backed faction. But who speaks for whom is difficult to
determine when it appears neither side speaks with the other. In fact,
band councillor Irene Dedam says nobody from the AFN communicates
directly with her husband, Chief Wilbur Dedam, any more.
Based on this experience alone, I'm reluctant to endorse any further
fisheries related actions that are proposed by the AFN, including
its new draft strategy statement, which was tabled at the end of last
week's conference.
Although the strategy is still in the draft stages, its initial wording
makes it seem that the AFN is setting itself up to dominate all working
relationships between the Crown and various First Nations governments.
There is, for example, a suggestion that the AFN establish a "rapid
response team that can be called upon to assist First Nations with
negotiations, mediation and communications."
That sounds exactly like what was attempted in Esgenoopetitj to no
avail.
I know that I've learned from my experience, but I can't speak for
the AFN.
Alison Blackduck is a Dogrib writer and a full-time student at Concordia
University in Montreal. She can be reached at blackduck@hotmail.com
Top
{ au: Alison Blackduck dt: 02/06/01
sc: tstar}